Comments on comics from the past two weeks including
Chatological Humor: Denim Friendly Since 2001; Talking Susan Boyle (UPDATED 4.24.09) aka Tuesdays With Moron, Gene Weingarten, Washington Post Staff Writer, Tuesday, April 21, 2009; 12:00 PM.
--------------
What were they thinking?: So the comics editors brought back "Judge Parker." Okay, fine, I'm cool with that. I was wondering if Sophie was going to make the cheerleading squad. But to make room, they chose a strip to move to the KidsPost page, and the strip they chose was... "Agnes"? Um, has anyone involved with this decision actually read "Agnes"? It's often incomprehensibly edgy, certainly for the KidsPost demographic.
I have a ten-year-old daughter who likes to read some of the comics, and I can tell you without a doubt which strip most appeals to her: "Baby Blues." It manages to be truly funny but also understandable to kids. If the point of this exercise is to get more kids to look at KidsPost, they should really rethink the choice of strip.
Could you go slap the comics editors around for me, Gene?
Gene Weingarten: I am not allow to slap comics editors.
_______________________
I am not one of your sycophant groupies...: I want you to know how utterly reprehensible it is that your weekly harangue against Hagar the Horrible, Beetle Bailey, Dennis the Menace, Family Circus et al should result in your comic strip being picked up by a syndicate. Many of us cut our teeth and learned how to read from those very strips and what you don't seem to understand is that not every comic has to appeal to the tastes of a 60 year old, old fart like yourself.
So go enjoy your ill gotten fruit but know that some of us recognize the dublicity of it all especially picking on poor little PJ -- I mean heck, he's just a little kid !
Gene Weingarten: I think P.J. is something like 48 years old.
_______________________
[apropos of a previous discussion of what makes a hero]Krypt, ON: I find it interesting that Superman would not be considered a hero here for doing good since he risks nothing and expends, for him, little effort, but would be because he does it on his own time. Sometimes. When he isn't defrauding a newspaper. Which may be the real reason newspapers are going under.
Gene Weingarten: Whoa, whoa. He is a hero. It's not a question necessarily of what you risk, it's what you sacrifice. He sacrifices privacy. He sacrifices the ability to be a fully realized person. He is definitely a hero.
Rockville, Md.: Gene,
Is there something wrong with me because I was incredibly turned on by seeing Janis topless in yesterday's Arlo and Janis? I'm a happily married 39 year old guy if it makes a difference.
washingtonpost.com:
Arlo and Janis, (April 20) Gene Weingarten: I've said it before. Arlo and Janis is the hottest comic strip maybe ever.
_______________________
Funny Pa, PR: Since you're not allowed to bring this up: the April 17 Lio was genuinely unreadable at the size the Post printed it. The only way to make sense of it was to work backwards: there was a staggering drunk spider, so the spiderweb must have had something intoxicating in it.
At first there didn't seem to be anything in the middle of the web at all. Prolonged close study revealed what I guess was a beer can. Figuring this out was not worth the eyestrain.
Gene Weingarten: This was absolutely true. It's how I had to read it to get the joke. Liz, can you
link to this? Online, it will be bigger; but imagine trying to figure it out at an inch high.
and a 'new' contest, although Cavna's been doing this off and on at Comic Riffs, usually with editorial cartoons.Chatological Humor: Swine Flu Fever; Quiet Cars; Cat Calls (UPDATED 4.30.09), Gene Weingarten, Washington Post Staff Writer, Wednesday, April 29, 2009; 12:00 PM
Several weeks ago, Chatological Humor discontinued its regular Comic Pick of the Week feature, on the theory that it would be unseemly for me to critique comic strips if I were soon to be the author of one. I promised to find a replacement feature, and here it is. It's going to be reader-generated, and the first submission is by Justin Stone.
That's what we're doing. Rewrite dialog balloons for any current comic strip; you can either post your results on a Web site like flickr or Facebook, and send me a link, or you can send it right to me at weingarten(at)washpost.com. Important: You must make your dialogue fit the existing balloons. As Justin discovered, this can be hard. Comic-strip writing is Pinteresque.
Gene Weingarten: Ooh, this just in. Chatological Humor might have had a beneficial, tangible effect in the world.
Last week, a chatter noted, correctly, that "Agnes" was a tone-deaf joice as the comic strip chosen to appear on the KidsPost page. Very, very true: It's excellently cynical, even nihilistic, with big words and complex themes.
Someone apparently listened. I've just heard that it goes back on the comics page, and will be replaced in KidsPost by Frazz. Much better choice. Frazz or Big Nate would have been my choices.
I disagree here, as did some other Comic Riffs commenters. Garfield or Peanuts would have been a better choice. My 11-year-old daughter doesn't read Frazz.
maria sharapova gallery
maria sharapova pictures gallery
maria sharapova wallpaper gallery
maria sharapova tennis gallery
maria sharapova beach gallery
gallery of maria sharapova
maria sharapova photo gallery
maria sharapova gallery pictures
maria sharapova picture gallery
maria sharapova in white dress
maria sharapova tennis balls
maria sharapova sign pictures
maria sharapova smile pictures
maria sharapova modeling
maria sharapova kiss for fans
maria sharapova famous tennis star
maria sharapova very beautiful
russian tennis star maria sharapova
maria sharapova now live in usa
maria sharapova tennis pictures
maria sharapova famous pictures
Creativitat compartida? Clar! La creativitat sempre ha estat compartida. Sempre s’ha dit que poetes i novel·listes deixen de ser propietaris de la seua obra quan la publiquen, perquè aquesta passa a mans dels lectors. Les obres literàries o artístiques adquireixen sentit ple quan arriben al públic a què van dirigides (al receptor, espectador, destinatari o com es vulga dir). Això, naturalment, no té res a veure amb els drets morals o econòmics que genera l’obra, que sempre han de quedar salvaguardats, perquè els autors tenen dret a viure dels guanys que proporciona el seu ofici creatiu. I cal dir que creativitat sempre ha estat sinònim d’exclusivitat —o millor dit, de singularitat—. La repetició, en canvi, sol anar associada al plagi, a la còpia, a la imitació. Per això, els mitjans totalment compromesos amb la creativitat solen exigir originalitat. Internet no ha modificat substancialment aquests postulats; simplement multiplica de manera exponencial la xarxa d’intercanvis, la interactivitat i la velocitat de recepció dels missatges. Ha propiciat, això sí, produccions més breus i fragmentades, una nova modalitat de creació, la feta a dos, quatre, moltes mans, i també l’aparició —esporàdica encara— de creacions que es pengen a la xarxa de forma desinteressada, sense aspirar a tenir cap benefici econòmic (drets morals sí; tothom haurà observat que els blogs solen exhibir el logo de Creative Commons o similars). I precisament en aquesta lliga sembla jugar El Penjoll.
d’altres plataformes i centres socials, al de diverses coordinadores... «S’ha de crear xarxa», diuen. No tenen prou amb comprovar que la gent interessada hi pot accedir a través de les llistes d’enllaços, de darrers comentaris i de seguidors, o a través del blogroll de blogs preferits. Han de penjar el post a tot arreu. I una última qüestió: seria interessant de saber quanta gent llegeix al final la informació omnipresent. Comentaris, no sembla rebre molts, encara que —ja ho sé— això no demostra res. En fi, ¿té aquesta estratègia comunicativa de caire reticular el ressò desitjat o, més bé, alguns dels hipotètics destinataris estan passant d'ella olímpicament? Abans de contestar, com que «cap geperut no sol veure's la seua gepa», convindria que algú fes una comprovació independent.
